Skip to main content

US reacts to Korea threat with Orion’s shield

Orion’s shield


Possible North Korean Threat Triggers Beefed-Up U.S. Missile Shield
The Obama Administration took the offense on missile defense Friday, saying it will fatten up the nation’s thin missile-defense shield by nearly 50% to defend against a possible North Korean attack. March 15, 2013


Events that make the news can usually be seen fairly graphically in ancient star images. This is one such example. We start here with November 28, 2012  lunar eclipse at Washington. Notice from the chart that, by the rules of mundane astrology,  it is important for Washington since the eclipse moon along with the  associated Yod aspects both the angles (i.e. the Ascendant and the MC).



The Mars [8cp58] – Pluto [8cp12] leg of the Yod is part of the ancient Chinese asterism Yo.  The asterism Yo (that included stars from 5 to 8 Capricorn) was said to preside over locks or barriers. This referred to the locking of gates and barriers at the frontiers against barbarian attacks. [1]

Jupiter [11ge52] at the apex of the yod is conjunct the  stars that form the Shield of Orion. Pi3 (π3) Orion, Tabit, [12ge06]  is the northern star in the Hunter, one of a number of pi stars on the skin that is held in his left hand that he is showing off as a trophy. The other stars are unnamed; omicron1, omicron2, pi1, pi2, pi4, pi5 and g; these stars are in a vertical line [12 to 14ge] at the right of the figure of Orion, and indicate the lion's skin. With Pliny these stars in the lion's skin are supposed to have been a separate constellation known as the Shield, made from the bull's hide of the Hyriean legend.[2,3]

It now only remains to show that progressing the eclipse chart brings the stars of the Shield on to any of the progressed angles for the date of the news item. Shown below is the progressed eclipse chart for March 15, 2013. Notice that the progressed Ascendant is conjunct Moon-Jupiter and the stars of the Shield of Orion!


[1] Secrets of the Ancient Skies; Diana K. Rosenberg [v.1, p.741]

Comments