Skip to main content

Astro-meteorology of the UK storm Xaver



A powerful ‘windstorm’ that authorities are warning could be the worst to hit the European continent in more than half a century barrelled over the U.K. Thursday and made way for Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium, Denmark and Sweden, threatening massive power outages, extreme flooding in coastal regions, and hurricane-force winds.


In Astro-Meteorology the relevant cardinal ingress chart offers clues to the weather. When further supported by Mercury ingress charts it can give a good idea about changes in wind patterns. Recall that the planet Mercury rules the winds and is often  pictured as travelling with wings on his feet, and he is as changeable as thought itself. Mercury so readily changes to the quality of the sign into which it moves, that his entering a new sign of the zodiac is sufficient change of polarity to warrant the erection of a new air movement chart.





Shown here is the Sun’s Libra Ingress chart for Edinburgh, UK . As always mundane charts become extremely significant if planets aspect angles. Here we have a Moon-Venus-Saturn-Mars T-square aspecting the meridian axis.  The Moon [11ta53] occupies the Arabic Lunar Mansion Al Sharitain’s  “whirlwinds”.

Major historical storms occur under these stars: a Bay of Bengal cyclone and 40 ft seawave that hit Calcutta in 1864, killing 50,000; the 1881 Haifong, China typhoon (thousands died) and the Canton typhoon of 1862; a huge cyclone and 50 ft tidal wave that hit the Ganges delta in 1970, killing 300,000. This was Mars at a 1992 eclipse two months before Category 5, Hurricane Andrew devastated Florida, and at the 2005 perigee Full Moon before Hurricane Katrina demolished New Orleans and many more.[1]

Progressing the ingress chart to 5 Dec. we get the T-square Moon now sharply aspecting the horizon axis triggering the effects of Al Sharitain






But that is not all. What is most amazing is that Mercury moved into Sagittarius the very same day. The chart for its ingress into Sagittarius shows Algorab of Corvus[14li]  on the Ascendant [14li]. The stars of Corvus formed an archaic Euphratean lunar mansion whose patron god was Im-dugud-khu, “The Great Storm Bird” or the “Storm Bird of the Evil Wind” [2].  Jupiter [19cn] is on the MC conjunct the star Castor [20cn] of the Gemini Twins. 








The Twins Castor and Pollux have a historical reputation for storms at sea. Diana Rosenberg records “storms (extreme barometric lows)” against these stars and gives the following examples [3].

This was Uranus at  a 440 CE Solar Eclipse: the city of Ys in Brittany was “submerged in great flood” and “the sea submerged great  parts of Wales, most cattle drowned”; there was a July 1281 New Moon here at Kublai Khan’s second attempt  to invade Japan: a vast Armada of 4400 ships and 142,000 Mongol, Chinese and Korean troops set out in July; in Aug a typhoon struch destroying about 4000 ships and more than 100,000 troops; this was the Node at a July 1591 SolEcl, the year four hurricanes in one month sank more than 100 ships in the Western Hemisphere;  Mars at the Great Galveston Hurricane of 1900 : the barometer fell to 27.49 in – a US record up to that time: the city was inundated, about 8000 killed, “one of the worst natural disasters to hit the North American continent,” the Node in 1889 when a typhoon wrecked the ships of Germany and the US that were about to go to war; other events with placements here include the 1935 Category 5 Labor Day Hurricane that hit the Florida Keys: the barometer fell to 26.35 in, the lowest ever observed in the US: winds were estimated at 150 – 200 mph (all wind instruments were destroyed), it was labelled – “the most intense and tightly knit storm ever to hit Florida”; the terrible Lake Okeechobee hurricane of 1928 (barometer 27.43 in; 5th lowest in US history) that killed 5000 in the US and Caribbean; a massive cyclone with 145 mph wind speed that hit Bangladesh in 1911, killing about 139,000 people and half a million animals and many more.


[1] Secrets of the Ancient Skies, Diana K. Rosenberg (v.1, p.165)

Comments