Skip to main content

Ancient scrolls give up their secrets




Metallic ink was used to inscribe scrolls regarded as an archaeological wonder, according to scientists. The discovery pushes back the date for the first use of metallic ink by several centuries. The Herculaneum scrolls were buried by the eruption of Mount Vesuvius in AD79 and are charred and fragile. Previous efforts to read them, over many centuries, has damaged or destroyed some of the scrolls. The task of reading the surviving scrolls has fallen to scientists using technology such as the European synchrotron, which produces X-rays 100 billion times brighter than the X-rays used in hospitals. Last year, physicists used the 3D X-ray imaging technique to decipher writing in the scrolls. Now they have gleaned that the papyrus contains high levels of lead, which they say could only have come from its intentional use in the ink. "We found some metal - some lead - in the ink, which is supposed to come four centuries after," said Dr Emmanuel Brun of the European Synchrotron in Grenoble, France.  March 22;  http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-35865470









The news on the Herculaneum scrolls comes just a day before the lunar eclipse of March 23. A chart for the eclipse at Grenoble, France has it placed very significantly on the meridian. The Sun on the MC is conjunct Mercury square Hades.  Since Mercury rules documents and the TNP Hades, among other things, refers to the past ,[1] the simplest meaning of the combination is an ancient document. But, in addition,  Martha Wescott  gives us the following delineations [2].

Mercury-Hades: Aspect indicates the quality of progressive, analytical skill – understanding how “items” constitute a whole and the causal connection and erection of data – thus the ability to parse and “build a case from the ground up;” to investigate facts or ideas; to work out the details – even if it means attention to picayune, obscure fact; “dead” languages(such as Latin)  or perusal of classics.
  



[2] The Orders of Light; Martha Lang-Wescott (p.52)

Comments